This post is actually a comment I tried to post on Joshua's blog, but it wouldn't let me because it contained one of the forbidden words. Bonus points to anyone who can figure out which word tripped the block. Warning: If you follow the links herein to the posted pictures you may regret it. It not appropriate for viewing at work. It is not appropriate, period.
On a related note, I'm reasonably sure you've seen this, but have you seen this?
Posted by flamingbanjo at April 8, 2006 03:46 PMWow. That's just weird. I don't think I'd feel "honored" by that, myself, but hey. Anybody know why there's a bear head involved?
Posted by: The Green Man at April 9, 2006 02:23 AMIt's supposed to be pro-life. I'm just so very lost, because nothing could scream "ABORT ABORT" more loudly to me.
The bear head is supposed to be some kind of allusion to the "baby on a bearskin rug" pictures.
Posted by: anne at April 9, 2006 04:01 AMI'm gonna guess that the trigger word was related. But it could be that Josh has outlawed reason on his site. Wouldn't put it past him.
Posted by: Appalachia at April 9, 2006 07:22 AMOf course, I know what the words are. And believe you me, there's a good reason they're blocked.
Posted by: Joshua at April 11, 2006 01:43 PM