September 05, 2006

Sugar Swings!

Sugar!Note To Mothers.JPG

Sugar!BWwholepage.JPG

Like a turtle needs a seatbelt
This was a full-page ad in a 1965 issue of LIFE magazine. You will notice it was presented by Sugar Information, Inc. SII was the “public education and communication” arm of the Sugar Association, formed in 1943 and dedicated to "the scientific study of sugar’s role in food and communication of that role to the public.” The “Sugar Swings” campaign was launched after the Research arm of the Sugar Association, known as the Sugar Research Foundation, discovered, through carefully-conducted impartial studies, a troubling trend: There was a veritable energy crisis afflicting our nation’s young, perky schoolchildren. High school students like Mary who could formerly be relied on to sail through their activity-packed daily schedules with boundless sugar-fueled energy and enthusiasm were being discovered in increasing numbers slumped over unconscious in mid-Watusi at sock-hops all across the nation. The culprit? The growing popularity of artificially-sweetened foods and beverages.

Realizing that the exhaustion which is the inevitable result of a sugar-poor diet would not only leave children America’s youth vulnerable to “the bugs and ailments that are always lying in wait,” but also to the incursions of Communism, the diligent scientific experts at SRF wasted no time alerting their partners at Sugar Information, Inc. to the imminent threat facing our nation’s best and brightest. Ads like the one you see above were the result, and they arrived not a second too soon. Armed with the knowledge that daily consumption of sugar was essential to continued health and well-being, concerned mothers across the nation took to heart the life-saving advice to “Play safe with your young ones – make sure they get sugar every day.”

You know what else is a valuable source of energy for growing boys and girls? Cigarettes.

philipmorrisKeenYOungTastes1.jpg

Posted by flamingbanjo at September 5, 2006 11:48 PM
Comments

I've had the "they need sugar" conversation with Czechs here, who don't understand why I limit my son's intake.

This is beautiful work, though.

Posted by: anne at September 7, 2006 02:01 AM

i have to agree with them on the point about artificial sweeteners being useless though - if your kid isn't overweight, i'd much rather give them the sugar than whatever toxic powder they're telling us is safe these days.

Posted by: amy.leblanc at September 7, 2006 12:12 PM

I'm still looking for proof that the SRF were heavily funded by the American Dental Association.

Posted by: beige at September 7, 2006 04:43 PM

....sugar doesn't have what it takes?

It doesn't swing?

Well, I'm fucked.

Posted by: Tina at September 8, 2006 11:32 AM

As for the sugar v. whatever-artifical-brand-of-the-moment debate, I figure it's easier to jog off a couple of pounds than a brain tumor.

Posted by: John Galt at September 8, 2006 04:59 PM

"Sugar Swings" is certainly an ironically accurate depiction of what is probably going to happen to poor Mary and all her sucrose-gobbling friends, once all that refined white sugar gets pumped into their bloodstreams at the rate of about 30 calories per minute.

Makes me wonder why the National Carbohydrate Council wasn't more on the ball back in those days.

Posted by: COMTE at September 10, 2006 07:00 PM

Thus the bunhead diet was born!

...although I suppose honey and cigarettes is the more traditional form (maybe we could go back in time and honey and sugar could duke out which is the most natural energy burst).

Posted by: ida at September 11, 2006 05:04 PM

Oh, honey would win, hands down. For most of recorded history honey has been THE sweeetener of choice - in fact, pretty much the ONLY choice until the late 15th Century or so, when the Spanish caught on to the East Indian method of extracting sugar from cane pulp.

Posted by: COMTE at September 12, 2006 10:53 AM

What the FDA doesn't want you to see!

http://www.stevia.net/

In case you're tired of following the pro-pot lobby...

Posted by: Basil at October 5, 2006 01:38 PM

Now, THAT is logic that even a herd of 50's housewives could not trample down.

That is why I feed my babies maple syrup instead of milk... because I love them more than anything in this whole wide flat world.

Posted by: Eve at October 18, 2006 09:05 AM